All entries must be supported by a portfolio of evidence and should comprise:

• An Abstract
• Supporting documentation
• Additional documentation

Please read the description below for each of the items.

Abstract

An abstract between 1,500 and 2,500 words long should provide a descriptive summary of the evidence provided to support your submission.

Structure

The structure of the abstract should comprise:

• Title
• Submitting organisation/person
• Short summary (100 words)
• What is the context?
• What was the problem?
• How was it solved?
• How were the stake-holders involved?
• What was the impact?
• What lessons should be learned?
• List of evidence (incl. type/source/reference)
• Supporting documentation

The supporting documentation uploaded with the abstract should provide a description for each piece of evidence identified in the abstract
Evidence can include one or more of the following:

• learning material
• learning outcomes
• audio or video file
• reports
• documentation
• testimonials—learners, clients, third party, etc.
• others

The purpose of each piece of evidence should be clearly established and, when required, a link to external online resources should be provided along with the required identification data.
Additional documentation
When supporting documentation requires information that can’t be contained in a PDF file, e.g. video, simulation, game, tool, learning resource, etc. a web link and required identification should be provided to the judges.

NB 1: it is the responsibility of the candidate to ensure that the link and identification are working properly at all times.

NB 2: when the judgement requires the manipulation by a judge of a tool, a learning resource or some other non-sequential reading material, a usage scenario should be provided.